The Agriculture Boom Goes Bust
-
Font Size:
The agriculture boom is in full swing. Ag commodity prices remain high. A worldwide race to buy up farms in far off lands is in full swing. And fertilizer stocks have been the top performers during the whole downturn.
Fertilizer stocks like Potash Corp (POT), Mosaic (MOS), and Agrium (AGU) have had stellar runs. But over the last few months, fertilizer stocks have been very volatilite.
I’ve got good news though. For anyone that missed out on the first run-up in fertilizer stocks and has been waiting for a dip, a chance to buy could be days away. A few top fertilizer stocks have the potential to get crushed in the next few days. The combination of lofty valuations, high expectations, and soaring costs could spark it all.
Input Costs Soar
On page 29, Mosaic said it all:
A significant increase in the price of natural gas, ammonia, sulfur, or energy costs, that is not recovered through an increase in price or our related crop nutrients products could have a material impact on our business.
Over the past few months, natural gas, ammonia, and sulfur prices have risen sharply. Ammonia prices are up 140% in 2008. Sulfur prices have skyrocketed too.A ton of sulfur cost $30 a ton in 2000. It climbed to $450 a ton at the start of the year. The last sale I saw was at $800 a ton.
Sulfur and ammonia are traded between privately and prices are set by private contract, much like uranium. So it’s tough to get exact pricing data from day to day. However, prices are going up. And the rise in the first half of the year has been very strong.
Sulfur and ammonia price increases aren’t good for fertilizer producers. That’s not the biggest factor here though. The largest impact on fertilizer producers’ profits will be natural gas.
Natural Gas and Fertilizer
According to Mosaic’s most recent annual report, the company has a lot of exposure to natural gas prices. Mosaic states, ‘Natural Gas is the primary raw material used in nitrogen production and may represent as much as 90% of a ton of nitrogen-based fertilizer.”
That’s huge exposure. 90% of costs!
Of course, that’s just for nitrogen-based fertilizer. It takes a lot of natural gas to make other types of fertilizer.
Natural gas costs account for as much as 85% of ammonia-based fertilizer. And solution mining of potash, which Mosaic owns the largest potash solution mine in the world, uses a lot of natural gas. Mosaic estimates 14% of its potash production costs go to pay the gas bill.
When it comes to fertilizer, natural gas is very, very important. During the 2nd quarter of 2008, natural gas prices climbed about 40%. Mosaic admits only “a portion” of its natural gas consumption is hedged. As a result, I expect high natural gas prices to have a big impact on profits.
Not all Fertilizer Companies Created Equal
Not all fertilizer companies are the same though. Only a few produce highly sought after and monopoly protected potash. They are the only ones that really benefit from soaring potash prices. Other fertilizer companies, which have to buy potash, ammonia, etc. don’t enjoy being able to pass on higher costs forever.
Sure, they can pass on the higher costs to customers for a while, but that will only work for so long. Reuters published the headline, “New threat to food system: pricey fertilizer.” High prices will reduce total fertilizer used.
It’s simple economics. Fertilizer prices are not inelastic. High prices are reducing total fertilizer use around the world. We could see a big impact on reduced consumption when the Q2 numbers come out in the next few days.
It’s Happened Before
This wouldn’t be the first time high costs wrecked fertilizer stocks though. Back in 2005, when hurricanes sent natural gas prices soaring, fertilizer stocks were hit hard. In the two months that followed Hurricane Katrina, fertilizer industry stocks fell 25% on average.
Among the hardest hit were Mosaic, Terra Industries (TRA), and CF Industries (CF). They are all diversified fertilizer producers.
This time, it’s not going to be a sudden price shock. It’s been building for a long time. And when you consider the run fertilizer stocks have had, a sharp sell-off could be on the way.
Fertilizer Takes Center Stage
The catalyst for the sell-off is probably going to be earnings reports. Although it’s tough to ever predict earnings down to the penny, there’s a lot going against the fertilizer sector.
After huge run-ups, they are at some of the highest valuations they’ve been at in years. And Wall Street is expecting a lot from this sector to justify those high prices. In just the past two months, consensus estimates for Mosaic’s profits have risen 40%. Even missing by a penny or two could send these high-flyers down another 10% or more.
Monsanto (MON) is the perfect example of what can happen when news isn’t good enough in the agriculture sector. Monsanto reported earnings in June. The results were good. Wall Street was expecting earnings per share of $1.34. Monsanto booked profits of $1.45 per share.
Everything should be good, right?
Wrong. Earnings were strong, but they weren’t strong enough. Monsanto’s shares fell 8% right away. Sine then, the downtrend has continued. Monsanto is a diversified agricultural company and is not a pure fertilizer play. It does, however, show what can happen when expectations aren’t met…regardless of the long-term outlook.
Now, with earnings reports coming in just a few days, I expect more downswings to come. The three stocks I expect to get hit the hardest are the most diverse fertilizer producers. They all report earnings within the next 10 days.
Terra Industries reports on July 24, Mosaic on July 28, and CF Industries on July 29.
Buy on Weakness
There are a lot of considerations to make when it comes fertilizer stocks. As we’ve seen many times in the past, the combination of extremely lofty valuations, high expectations, and missing the quarterly numbers or cutting the outlook for the future can send share prices plummeting.
In this case, it still doesn’t look like too many traders have accounted for the impact of natural gas prices on fertilizer company profits.
Over the long-term agriculture is set to be a secular bull market. For now though, it comes down to a risk/reward proposition. If a fertilizer company beats estimates…it might get a small spike. But if they miss…they sell-off will surely come.
There’s not much upside and a lot of downside. So many things are going well for the agriculture sector for the long term. For now though, I’m afraid that could be what spells a big correction in agriculture stocks.
At Q1 Publishing we always focus on risk/reward. And when it comes to agriculture stocks and the upcoming earnings, the risk certainly appears to outweigh any potential reward.
Disclosure: Currently, I am not short or long any of the stocks listed in this article. But if Mosaic shares climb back to the $145 level this week or we see a 10% rally in Terra Industries or CF Industries, I will be.
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
ETFs In Focus
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- Martin Wolf on Capitalism
- Interview with Jim Rogers, Part I: Bigger Financial Shocks Loom
- Four Brazilian Profit Plays
- Apple & Google: A Detailed Comparison
- Hey Vanguard, Can We Get a VMT and a VMTX?
- EA vs. Take Two: Now They’re Talking
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Time to Pull the Trigger on Four Oil Service Stocks »
- The Great Consumer Crash of 2009 »
- 5 Potential Buyout Targets in Biotech - Barron's »
- Apple: Great Company with Lofty Valuation - Due for Pullback »
- Broadcom Could Jump 40% on Growing Smartphone Market - Barron's »
- What’s Going on with Sirius XM Stock? »
- Forget $100 a Barrel - Oil Will Plummet to $30 »
- Restoring Credibility to Ambac and MBIA »
- The Disconnect Between Supply and Demand in Gold & Silver Markets »
- Will Sprint's Instinct Go Satellite with Sirius XM? »
- Fannie, Freddie Shareholders Will Be Left Holding the Bag - Barron's »
-
Long Ideas
-
Short Ideas
-
Cramer's Picks
- Northgate: Mid-Tier Gold Producer with Strong Cashflow
- Toll Brothers Staying Alive - Fast Money Midday Recap (8/19/08)
- Hedge Fund Tracking: Blue Ridge Capital (John Griffin)
- Petrobras: Buy and Sit Tight Like Soros
- Screener Picks, Part II: Three Mid-cap Growth Stocks
- Lowe’s Weathers a Tough Retail Market
- 5 Impressive Stocks in This Difficult Market
- Take Advantage of Phishing Scams With Security Software
- Johnson & Johnson: The Type of Growth Stock I Favor
- Adams Express: A Cheap Closed-End Fund
- Full list of Long Ideas »
- Three Casino Stocks Rolling Over
- New Web Site For Short Sellers: You Gotta Love Capitalism
- Commodity Carnage: Where to Turn Next?
- Fannie and Freddie Shareholders Run for the Exit
- Goldman: Readying Short Position Initiation Sequence
- Apple: Great Company with Lofty Valuation - Due for Pullback
- Russia's Too Risky - Barron's
- Fannie, Freddie Shareholders Will Be Left Holding the Bag - Barron's
- Pilgrim's Pride: The Weakest Link in the Food Chain
- Document Security Systems: Running Out of Time
- Full list of Short Ideas »
- Still Growing - Cramer's Mad Midday (8/19/08)
- Which Stock to Pick - Cramer's Mad Money (8/18/08)
- Buy Weyerhauser - Cramer's Lightning Round (8/18/08)
- The Price of Oil - Cramer's Mad Money (8/18/08)
- Great Execution Pick - Cramer's Mad Money (8/14/08)
- Beaten Down Buy - Cramer's Lightning Round (8/14/08)
- The Fry Guy - Cramer's Midday Mad Money (8/14/08)
- Go Orbital - Cramer's Mad Money (8/13/08)
- Buy AMD Here - Cramer's Lightning Round (8/13/08)
- Time For Google - Cramer's Midday Mad Money (8/13/08)
- Full list of Cramers Picks »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
This article has 27 comments:
1973
PS - To all those who read this article please go to author bio and then to previous articles and see for yourself what he has said.
It
There seams to be a strong case for growing demand due to the wealth affect of developing nations with large populations. However, the author says:
"High prices are reducing total fertilizer use around the world. We could see a big impact on reduced consumption when the Q2 numbers come out..."
Does this really make sense? Did farmers cut back on fertilizer use in April, May & June? If there were signifcant cutbacks then how POT negotiate very large price increases for current and future deliveries? Something does not add up here. Where is the analysis of the net affect?
Disclosure: long RJA (thinking about buying POT below $200)
If farmers want good yields per acre then they have to fertilze.
They might get away with using less one season but thats about it.
With the population of the planet exploding food will be in demand.
Come to think about it, it already is :)
Check out this:
www.greenfaucet.com/tr...
MON and others reach their bounce point.
end193
"It’s simple economics. Fertilizer prices are not inelastic. High prices are reducing total fertilizer use around the world. We could see a big impact on reduced consumption when the Q2 numbers come out in the next few days."
Wrong. Fertilizer prices ARE relatively inelastic. As long as there's a strong demand for food, farmers are gonna try and grow it. In fact, the precise reason for the recent spike in fertilizer prices is BECAUSE of the ever-increasing world food demand. There's a pretty direct correlation between fertilizer prices and food prices, because as DeltaXray7 wisely said, "If farmers want good yields per acre then they have to fertilze [sic]."
It
I would assume there are a lot of fixed cost that a farmer incurrs regardless of output/yield (land, equipment, facilities/storage plus some fixed number of employees). If I'm right (I have no data to support this) that crop farmers have lots of fixed cost to cover, then the incremental cost to produce incremental crops is insignificant. Any extra crops he can get out of using more/better fertilizers is almost all profit that drops to his bottom line.
Am I wrong?
Punkrockford
Holdsworth
Disclosure -- Long POT, MOS, AGU, CF, CAGC.OB, SQM.
Knight 77
On Jul 23 08:40 AM andyn wrote:
> Even with all these stock increases, forward P/E for AGU remains
> around 11... and remember they have already pre-announced an increase
> in earnings and the Indian/Chinese contracts are up for re-negotiation.
> This stock might explode to the upside if they guide further higher.
> Already the stock has retraced back from 110 to 95. Buy now and hang
> on atleast until end of the year.
Knight 77
On Jul 22 10:02 PM Rocknrollleg end193 wrote:
> Look at what you wrote here, Andrew:
>
> "It’s simple economics. Fertilizer prices are not inelastic. High
> prices are reducing total fertilizer use around the world. We could
> see a big impact on reduced consumption when the Q2 numbers come
> out in the next few days."
>
> Wrong. Fertilizer prices ARE relatively inelastic. As long as there's
> a strong demand for food, farmers are gonna try and grow it. In fact,
> the precise reason for the recent spike in fertilizer prices is BECAUSE
> of the ever-increasing world food demand. There's a pretty direct
> correlation between fertilizer prices and food prices, because as
> DeltaXray7 wisely said, "If farmers want good yields per acre then
> they have to fertilze [sic]."
guy
Too many experts, I don't dare sell anything right at the moment. POT, Monsanto, MOS, Mechtel, almost anything having to do with earl (petroleum). No choice but to hang in and wait...hopefully not for a vortex spiraling further downward.
On Jul 23 01:48 AM Jim Punkrockford wrote:
> I think we almost have it. The key will be demand. And demand has
> been strong due to high food COST, not high food demand. As soft
> commodities have come down, the demand for fertilizers will drop
> off. Also I agree that the risk reward right here is very bad in
> the short term. Disclosure I am short MOS.
Still, I believe, for all of the right reasons, that stocks like Mosaic, and the AG sector in general continue to offer traders and investors what may be arguably, the safest and potentially the most profitable opportunities in the current market.
Analysts should not be the catalyst for pulling the trigger on any stock, but good analysts are like trackers--they know what we are hunting for, and they know how to track the prey.
Many of the best of breed like Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, and even S & P continue to reiterate and/or upgrade their ratings for the AG sector and specific stocks with fantastic outlooks, buy and overweight ratings, and high great target prices on stocks such as MOS POT and others. Analysts can be a fickle group so the saving grace about most of these ratings is that they have based their analysis on solid research, fundamentals, and the fact that the dynamics of the AG sector are more straightforward than other sectors.
With most of the key statistics looking solid, and the products they produce being "Need Based" rather than discretionary, one only needs to use common sense and a Economics 101/102 analysis to arrive at a consensus that AG related goods and services will continue to be in high demand for a predictable period of time.
The supply and demand side will settle into trend cycle, but we are not at that point yet. Emerging markets are and will continue to grow and demand a greater diversification in diet, as well as more of their traditional foods. Factors like the price of oil, weather conditions, and government policies will play into the Ag sector, but once again, given the absolute need for these products, we should all take some comfort that the Agricultural “Bust” will be short lived.
On the other hand, I must emphasize that institutional investors (hedge and mutual funds, banks, etc.), may represent the most unpredictable element to for traders and analysts of AG stocks because their market power constitutes an ever present challenge to the savviest of traders.
Too often, these entities are the primary reason for unwarranted volatility as they manipulate the prices of solid stocks for their institution’s benefit alone.
The extraordinary power they have to move and/or manipulate the markets by trading stratospheric amounts of shares and their history of turning on a dime during the course of even one day is well documented.
These firms trade at levels that some governments can’t match, so I don’t consider it a stretch to compare their market moving power to those of weather events like a small hurricanes or winter storms. Needless to say, investors should always be looking over their shoulders and be aware that a hedge fund or other institution can come out of the shadows and we have to board out windows up for a stock or sector storm. The only traders that have the front on their radar are the very people that are doing these massive trades for the institutions.
It appears that the primary motivation is to control the stock as much as possible and move it in a somewhat predicable fashion that will allow them to safely double and triple dip their profits. They move into a sector or stock because of the great fundamentals, but then move the prices without regard to the fundamentals, good news, or great outlooks of the company or sector.
My bottom-line on the Ag play is that need based stocks like Mosaic that have great financials and supply and demand fundamentals other sectors would sell their in-laws for, so there is no doubt that the AGs will be able to weather the storms brought on by oil and the institutional investors and once again, move up at a rather sustained pace.
Mosaic will move back up to around $145 to $165 before September, and we could see a high (spike or otherwise) of around $180 by the end of the year. At this point, 2009 is too hard to call but there will be a new growing and thus a demand cycle for crops for both the Northern and Southern hemispheres, so I am looking for another positive year for AG stocks.
In the current markets, the Ag sector and well managed companies like Mosaic will continue to represent one of the few areas that offer us all an opportunity to sleep well knowing that the sector will be relatively stable for some time to come.
Finally, the hedge funds, other institutional investors and short-sellers know their clients want to be where the profits are. These institutions also know that their job is to do it in a manner that provides their clients with a safety edge, and there are few, if any areas that can provide both of those factors like Ag stocks.
Finally, the institutional investors know the fates of their careers are based on keeping their clients where positioned in sectors that consistently produce the highest profits and have high comfort levels in a volatile or for that matter, non-volatile markets. At this point, there is really no other place for them to go except for a quick dip, so we should all sleep better knowing that the Agriculturals will be relatively stable and wildly profitable for some time to come.
Hans, E.I.T.
While, I think you're discussion of the fundamentals of these companies is impeccable, I worry you may be ignoring the fact that the trading dynamics of these stocks are not only influenced by fundamentals. While these companies are in fact still booming, their stock prices can only sustain 100% growth rates for so long. These stocks(just look at Monsanto) have gone up around one thousand percent since 2002. Their major market drivers - the devaluation of the dollar lead to the heavy buying of their products abroad and increase of oil price which caused farmers to want to use chemical treatments instead of tractors - are now likely to lose steam because of the reinvigoration of the dollar and the decrease in the price of oil. The ag sector is not going to go insolvent, but its growth rate into the future is not simply attractive enough for the use of capital meant for value investing.
Personally, I would consider shorting far out of the money calls for the Jan2010 expiration on price spikes.
As a side note, I am a frequent reader of seeking alpha and think highly of the analysis at this website.