worthy

Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
comments17
  • Positive ratings 0
  • Negative ratings 0
  • Net rating 0
Filter comments by:
Highest rated Latest comments
Or filter by symbol:

Latest Comments
17 Comments

    • Tue Oct 7th 08:25 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Four Energy Bargains
      Larry,
      The adage, "Buy when there is blood in the streets", was, I believe, first iterated by Sir John Templeton, however, I have heard Mr. Buffet state it many times, and more significant, he has employed it's message many more times.
      View article »
    • Thu Aug 28th 09:30 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Pfizer Is Worth Another Look
      Excellent article presenting both sides of the case for Pfizer. Well done!
      View article »
    • Mon Aug 18th 14:50 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      GE: Why Buying on Weakness Is an Excellent Idea
      Welch got to paddle downstream.
      Immelt has had to paddle downstream
      View article »
    • Wed Aug 6th 13:00 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      A Supply Side Problem: Oil's High Price is Here to Stay
      To Brian Pursley,

      Yes, and who knows, perhaps baked beans and kraut will power the proverbial Dutch windmills.
      View article »
    • Wed Aug 6th 12:56 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      A Supply Side Problem: Oil's High Price is Here to Stay
      The two comments thus far are overly simplistic. The original article also has a flaw. The notion that a supply level of "x" will lead to inelastic pricing is valid. The problem is that we do not know at what supply level. We do not know the degree of demand destruction owing to the "flipside" of inelasticity, i.e. higher prices can reach levels that destroy demand to the degree that is presently immeasurable, because we have never been in a worldwide economic circumstance like we are now. Further, complementary fuels such as natural gas, coal, et al can "steal" some of that demand permanently. Add in solar, and wind generated electricity, and one is hard pressed to know what oil demand is going to look like over the next decade or two.
      It is probably a safe bet that we won't see $50 per barrel anytime soon, but???, who thought the Nasdaq could fall 80% as it did from the years 2000-2002? As the old saw goes, "never say never"...
      View article »
    • Sun Aug 3rd 09:19 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Exxon's Record Taxes, Capital and Exploration Spending in Perspective
      Amen, Dr. Perry. Thank you for setting the record straight.
      View article »
    • Wed Jul 23rd 08:28 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Four Long-Term Winners Selling at Deep Discounts
      Larry,

      Excellent! If only the analysts would use your grandmother's wisdom in their work...

      Worthy
      View article »
    • Sun Jul 6th 10:05 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      20 Guidelines for the Individual Investor
      Calisdad: Good manners+equity investments= LOSERS!
      View article »
    • Fri Jul 4th 08:50 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Pfizer: Dividend Yield Makes It a Haven in This Market
      Recall the late 90's when Pfizer briefly touched $50 with a multiple somewhat similar, and almost any drug analyst one listened to back in 1999 felt that Pfizer with its compelling pipeline was expensive for a good reason, and that its future growth was assured. Shift forward 9-10 years and we find the sentiment just the opposite. Back in '99 it was "Viagara all the way". Today it's "no pipeline to replace Lipitor". If this isn't a contrarian's delight, I don't know what one is! I own this stock.
      View article »
    • Sun Jun 29th 08:38 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Current Market Conditions and Future Returns
      AMEN! At least regarding CNBC. Their thinking is far too short term oriented. They also have the bad habit of cutting off the remarks of the best guests, while the least accurate are allowed to drone on.
      View article »
    • Fri Jun 27th 08:39 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Pay Attention to Oil Decline Rates
      Great article, Jim. I agree with you that getting accurate information as to actual rates of decline is somewhat difficult, but the main point that I think many people know, but ignore, is that all fields decline. Duh! Right? What is so problematic is not just replacing that production lost to decline, but adding enough more production to accomodate additional demand. 87mm bbls a day say losing 5% is 4.35 mm bbls lost each year. If we need an additional 1.5 mm bbls for increased demand, we need to find just short of 6 mm bbls per year. Very simple math. Regrettably, those who would deny drilling rights for the OCS, ANWAR, and other areas, just plain do not "get it". Actually, they probably do "get it", but need to get re-elected this fall...
      View article »
    • Sat Jun 21st 15:53 PM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Recommending Parker Drilling Below $10
      Parker Drilling will not succeed until all Parkers quit the management side of the business. They have mismanaged every opportunity for over thirty years. Their only mode of sustaining themselves as a business has been to dilute present shareholders with massive quantities on newly issued shares to stave off bankruptcy. Avoid.
      View article »
    • Sun May 11th 11:15 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Seeking Foreclosure Riches: What Does it All Mean?
      "rapacious, amoral, and loathsome", are terrific words to describe the
      "Donald". I don't know when real estate will bottom, but my guess is that Mr. Trump hasn't got a clue either. How can anyone so self-absorbed learn enough to predict anything? Perhaps going contrary to Trump would work?
      View article »
    • Sun Apr 27th 08:34 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Chesapeake Energy, Monsanto: Paying Tit for Tat
      Very dangerous advice! While one can agree that these companies represent industries that are booming, They could correct at any time leaving the option buyer penniless. There are safer ways to hedge against higher food and energy costs such as going long companies or etf's that reflect same.
      View article »
    • Sun Apr 27th 08:30 AM
      |
      Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      There Is Plenty to Fear in This Market
      WOW! Down .74% and 1.5% or so in a week! Are you serious? Those percentages hardly register!

      Jim
      View article »